I've had several fans approach me in recent weeks asking if the 2011-12 Wizards are on track to have a similar fate as the 2010-11 version - a team that struggled to a 19-31 record. The answer - for those of you who may be asking yourself the same question - is unequivocally no. Don't be fooled by Dakota's 8-10 record, this team is better than it's record, a topic that has been discussed several times in the KFYR-TV Sports Department.
How quickly we forget that last year's team started 2-12, was devoid of a strong veteran presence and frankly entered the regular season with a number of players who had no business being on a D-League roster. While the defense was solid, the offense was generally anemic, ranking 15th in the league in scoring efficiency and in the bottom half of the D-League in essentially every scoring scenario save for shots generated from offensive rebounds. So essentially, without the presence of current NBAer Chris Johnson, this team could have gone down as one of the worst offenses in league history. There was a disconnect on the court with players, a constant rate of turnover on the roster, a seemingly revolving door of journeymen players.
Don't mistake last year's team for the current one. The Wizards are deep, experienced and within a few questionable calls and unfortunate bounces from being over .500 on the year. A much maligned offense from a season ago has dramatically improved, the defense remains stout (most of the time) and the roster is surprisingly ripe with players capable of scoring baskets when they are sorely needed. Before the arrival of faces like Anthony Goods and Mike Hall last season who could the Wizards go to for a late game score? Johnson was an easy double-team on the block, Renaldo Major for all of his talents wasn't an elite iso player - the rest left far too much to be desired. The 2012 version can go to Edwin Ubiles, a continually developing Mike Anderson, Mo Baker and even rookie Justin Johnson in stretches.
Perhaps the most tangible difference in this year's team has been the ability to win more consistently in close games. Fans may point to the Wizards 50 percent success rate in crunch time this year - but this is a significant improvement from last season. Friday's double-overtime win over Tulsa - for all of the hair pulling it inspired - is a game Dakota would have lost in 2011. The fortitude necessary to overcome blowing a 16-point second-half lead wasn't present on that roster - at least not among enough players to result in a win.
Are these minor differences? Maybe, maybe not. Frankly it depends on how closely you observe this team. I don't consider it a coincidence that when asked, the individuals who initially approached me with the question that prompted this post had only been to a pair of home games - the season-opening loss to Los Angeles and the Friday night win over Tulsa. The perception created from these two games was that of a team capable of getting close and occasionally squeaking out a win. The bigger picture is more promising, more tantalizing, one that should have fans excited as we approach the midway point of the regular season.
How quickly we forget that last year's team started 2-12, was devoid of a strong veteran presence and frankly entered the regular season with a number of players who had no business being on a D-League roster. While the defense was solid, the offense was generally anemic, ranking 15th in the league in scoring efficiency and in the bottom half of the D-League in essentially every scoring scenario save for shots generated from offensive rebounds. So essentially, without the presence of current NBAer Chris Johnson, this team could have gone down as one of the worst offenses in league history. There was a disconnect on the court with players, a constant rate of turnover on the roster, a seemingly revolving door of journeymen players.
Don't mistake last year's team for the current one. The Wizards are deep, experienced and within a few questionable calls and unfortunate bounces from being over .500 on the year. A much maligned offense from a season ago has dramatically improved, the defense remains stout (most of the time) and the roster is surprisingly ripe with players capable of scoring baskets when they are sorely needed. Before the arrival of faces like Anthony Goods and Mike Hall last season who could the Wizards go to for a late game score? Johnson was an easy double-team on the block, Renaldo Major for all of his talents wasn't an elite iso player - the rest left far too much to be desired. The 2012 version can go to Edwin Ubiles, a continually developing Mike Anderson, Mo Baker and even rookie Justin Johnson in stretches.
Perhaps the most tangible difference in this year's team has been the ability to win more consistently in close games. Fans may point to the Wizards 50 percent success rate in crunch time this year - but this is a significant improvement from last season. Friday's double-overtime win over Tulsa - for all of the hair pulling it inspired - is a game Dakota would have lost in 2011. The fortitude necessary to overcome blowing a 16-point second-half lead wasn't present on that roster - at least not among enough players to result in a win.
Are these minor differences? Maybe, maybe not. Frankly it depends on how closely you observe this team. I don't consider it a coincidence that when asked, the individuals who initially approached me with the question that prompted this post had only been to a pair of home games - the season-opening loss to Los Angeles and the Friday night win over Tulsa. The perception created from these two games was that of a team capable of getting close and occasionally squeaking out a win. The bigger picture is more promising, more tantalizing, one that should have fans excited as we approach the midway point of the regular season.
RSS Feed